· Olivier Demichel  · 6 min read

Why Aerodynamics is Better for Slower Riders

Contrary to popular belief, aerodynamics is not only for professionals riding at 50 km/h. The slower you ride, the more optimizing your position can transform your final time. Scientific analysis and concrete examples.

Why Aerodynamics is Better for Slower Riders

Introduction

Many cyclists think:

“Aerodynamics is for the pros.”
“Below 40 km/h, it doesn’t make much difference.”

That’s wrong.

The laws of physics are identical for everyone.
And in reality, aerodynamics can represent a much more decisive time-saving lever for amateurs than for professionals.

Let us explain.

At what speed does aerodynamics start to matter in cycling?

Aerodynamic drag becomes the dominant force from just 15 km/h, where it already represents over 50% of total resistance on flat terrain. At 30 km/h, it reaches approximately 80%. Aerodynamics therefore concerns all cyclists, not just those riding above 40 km/h.

Aerodynamic drag (CdA): the resistance force exerted by air on a moving cyclist. It depends on the frontal area (A), the drag coefficient (Cd), and the square of speed. The product CdA (Cd × A) is the key metric: measured in m², it typically ranges from ~0.20 m² (optimized TT position) to ~0.40 m² (upright road position).

In other words: Even at “moderate” speed, air is already your main opponent.


Why do amateurs gain more time than pros by optimizing their aero?

We often hear:

“Pros ride faster, so aerodynamics matters more for them.”

That is partially true… but incomplete.

The reality is that when aerodynamic drag is reduced by 10%, the power saved is also close to 10% as early as 20 km/h. This leads to a speed increase of around 3% at constant power.
This reality is true for everyone.

Concretely, that means going from 40 km/h to 41.2 km/h, and from 20 km/h to 20.6 km/h.

So yes, the faster you ride, the greater the impact aerodynamics has on your speedometer. And gaining a few tenths of km/h may seem negligible at first glance…

And this is where a huge misunderstanding causes amateurs to lose a lot of time on their results…

👉 Let’s talk about time gains

When you ride at 40 km/h, 1 km takes 1 minute 30 seconds. At 41.2 km/h, it takes 1 minute 27 seconds.

When you ride at 20 km/h, 1 km takes 3 minutes. At 20.6 km/h, it takes 2 minutes 55 seconds.

In other words, when a fast cyclist improves aerodynamics by 10%, that’s 3 seconds gained per km. For the amateur riding half as fast, that’s more than 5 seconds gained per km!!!

Amateurs therefore have much more to gain on their overall times by optimizing their aerodynamics.

Time saved per kilometer based on initial riding speed — aerodynamic optimization gains

The image above shows the gains you can target when moving from an upright position to an optimized aerodynamic position on a road bike or on a time trial (or triathlon) bike. And yes, your position can help you gain up to 20 seconds per kilometer when riding at 20 km/h… The effect is amplified over long distances, and on an Ironman (180 km), the impact becomes even more spectacular. When an amateur is aiming to beat cut-off times, position therefore becomes crucial.

How much time can you save over 40 km by optimizing your position?

A 10% improvement in aerodynamics saves approximately 2 minutes 20 seconds over 40 km for a cyclist riding at 32 km/h, compared to only 1 minute 40 seconds for a cyclist at 45 km/h. The slower you ride, the greater the absolute time savings from aerodynamic optimization.

Let’s imagine two cyclists who both improve their aerodynamics by 10%. One initially rides at 45 km/h, the other at 32 km/h.

Estimated gain:

  • At 45 km/h → about 1 minute 40 seconds over 40 km
  • At 32 km/h → about 2 minutes 20 seconds over 40 km

The time gain is therefore always greater for the slower cyclist.

Over an Ironman distance (180 km), a 10% CdA improvement allows an amateur riding at 30 km/h to save more than 10 minutes on the bike leg — without producing a single extra watt.

Aero position vs. power: which is the better investment?

For an amateur:

  • Increasing FTP by 20 watts requires months of training.
  • Reducing CdA by 8 to 12% can be achieved in a few weeks.

And above all:

👉 Position is a free lever.

No need to buy a $10,000 bike.
No need for exotic sensors.

It is about learning to:

  • Optimize your position
  • Hold that position
  • Be powerful in that position

Why do most cyclists neglect aerodynamics?

Most cyclists ignore aerodynamics because it is invisible: unlike power (displayed on the computer) or heart rate (physically felt), aerodynamic drag produces no perceptible signal without dedicated tools. Three main reasons:

  1. Lack of real-time feedback
  2. Difficulty in feeling aerodynamic drag
  3. Excessive focus on power

Power is visible.
Aerodynamics is invisible. But AeroX definitively changes that !

Therefore, it is neglected.


Conclusion

Aerodynamics is not reserved for elites.

It is even more profitable for amateurs.

The real question is not:

“Do I ride fast enough for aerodynamics to matter?”

But rather:

”How many minutes am I willing to leave on the road?”


Frequently Asked Questions

Does aerodynamics matter below 30 km/h?
Yes. From just 15 km/h, air resistance accounts for over 50% of what slows you down on flat terrain. At 25 km/h, it exceeds 70%. Position optimization is relevant for all cyclists, not just fast ones.
How much time can you save on an Ironman with better positioning?
A 10% CdA improvement lets an amateur at 30 km/h save more than 10 minutes over the 180 km bike leg, without pedaling harder. For triathletes targeting cut-off times, this is a game-changer.
What is CdA in cycling?
CdA (Drag Coefficient × Frontal Area) is the number that sums up your air resistance. Measured in m², it ranges from 0.20 m² in an optimized TT position to 0.40 m² sitting upright on a road bike. Reducing CdA by 10% gives about 3% more speed at constant power.
Is it better to train harder or improve your position?
For most amateurs, improving position is faster and more cost-effective. Gaining 20 watts of FTP takes months of structured training. Reducing CdA by 10% can be achieved in a few weeks of position work, and the time savings are often greater.
How can you measure your aerodynamics without a wind tunnel?
Tools like AeroX measure frontal area in real time using a webcam on a smart trainer. Other methods exist (Chung test, on-bike sensors), but only AeroX provides instant feedback during training.

Read more:

Photo of Olivier Demichel
Olivier Demichel

Founder & Engineer

Former CNRS researcher and passionate triathlete, Olivier built AeroX to solve his own aero roadblocks. He now brings scientific rigor and athlete insight to riders — amateur to elite — who want to go faster.

Back to Blog

Related Posts

View All Posts »

Bike Fitting: Toward Performance Optimization

Bike fitting still relies heavily on experience and visual observation. But how can we objectively validate the real effectiveness of a position? Toward a new era of aerodynamics-based bike fitting.

Real-Time Aero Feedback: Get Faster on the Bike

Neuroscience shows that real-time feedback is key to improving performance. In cycling and triathlon, AeroX lets you see and feel how every posture change affects your speed — helping you save minutes without pushing harder.